Mac OS X 10.6.7 or later OS X Lion recommendedīoth are 64-bit only now, but Parallels Desktop 7 is slightly less demanding by allowing you to run it in Leopard.750MB free disk space for VMware Fusion and at least 5GB for each virtual machine.Minimum 2GB of RAM (4GB or more recommended).Internet connection required for select features and online updates.Mac OS X 10.5.8 or later (Leopard)/ Mac OS X 10.6.7 or later (Snow Leopard) /Mac OS X 10.7 or later (Lion).700MB hard drive space for Parallels Desktop installation, plus space to allocate to your virtual machine (1.4GB for the Switch to Mac Edition).2GB of RAM (4GB recommended to run Windows 7).Intel Core 2 Duo or higher Intel-based Mac required (Intel Core Solo and Core Duo processors are no longer supported.) MacBook Pro Core 2 Duo 2.4GHz Santa Rosa.Radeon 5870 and Quadro 4000 test scenarios.2TB HD striped RAID array for VM storage.120GB OWC Mercury Elite on 6GB/s SAS PCI express card for system disk.Mac Pro dual-hexacore Westmere Xeon 2.66 GHz.For the sake of consistency, I'll cover Parallels first and follow up with VMware Fusion's results. Differences are covered, and where there's a directly comparable result between the two apps, I've awarded a winner for that category.
VMware's feature updates sounded familiar-3D performance updates, Lion-specific interface enhancements, and OS X 10.7 virtualization support-so we decided to throw both programs into one review. Shortly after we started reviewing Parallels Desktop 7, VMware released a major update to its rival consumer-oriented virtualization app VMware Fusion, now at version 4. (Read our original Parallels 6 and Fusion 3 reviews for more on the older versions.) We stripped the hype wrappers off of the new Parallels Desktop 7 and VMWare Fusion 4 to see who's the baddest, and who's just bad. The powerhouses of Mac OS X virtualization both got beefy updates in the last few weeks and they're begging for comparison.
0 kommentar(er)
